"Social Media's Stranglehold: Instagram's 'Disruptive' Tactics Allegedly Impose a Costly Toll on Teen Sleep and Study, Unveiled in Federal Lawsuit
A bombshell federal lawsuit, jointly filed by 33 state attorneys general, claims that Meta-owned Instagram is intentionally using "disruptive" alerts and addictive features to ensnare underage users. The lawsuit alleges that despite being aware of the detrimental impact on teens' sleep and schoolwork, Instagram employs incessant notifications, including 'haptic alerts,' phone vibrations, pulses, sound notifications, banner notifications, emails, and 'badge notifications' displaying unread messages.
The lawsuit contends that these notifications are not only disruptive for all users but are especially harmful to young users who are more susceptible to distraction and psychological manipulation. The accusations form a crucial part of a broader federal lawsuit that accuses Mark Zuckerberg's social media giant of prioritizing profits over the safety of its users, contributing to a youth mental health crisis in the U.S.
In addition to the federal lawsuit, eight states and the District of Columbia have filed separate suits, emphasizing the link between heavy social media use and poorer sleep patterns, which can lead to increased rates of anxiety and depression—particularly among teen users grappling with the 'fear of missing out' phenomenon.
The lawsuit contends that young users, driven by FOMO, often feel compelled to stay connected at night, disrupting their sleep patterns. Even if users attempt to disable notifications, the states allege that Meta makes it challenging by defaulting to enabled alerts and pressuring users to re-enable them through follow-up messages.
These intrusive alerts are just one facet of the allegedly problematic business practices employed by Meta, all geared towards maximizing the time users spend on its apps. As critics intensify warnings about the detrimental impact of Meta's policies on youth, ranging from anxiety and depression to more severe outcomes, the legal battle unveils a contentious debate about the responsibility of social media platforms in safeguarding the well-being of their users."
"Meta's Manipulative Tactics: Lawsuit Alleges Harmful Impact on Teens Extends Beyond Alerts
A federal lawsuit, featuring 33 state attorneys general, reveals that Meta, the parent company of Instagram, is accused of employing harmful strategies that go beyond disruptive alerts. The lawsuit claims that Meta utilizes "dopamine-manipulating recommendation algorithms," promotes a "likes" system known to harm young users, and employs visual "filters" that allegedly contribute to negative body image development among teens.
Plaintiffs argue that Meta downplayed these risks publicly while contradicting its own internal research. The company is also accused of collecting personal data on users under 13 in violation of federal law, a claim Meta denies. Online children's safety group Fairplay alleges that the alerts are just one facet of Meta's broader agenda to target young people with manipulative techniques, prioritizing online engagement over safety and well-being.
Josh Golin, Executive Director of Fairplay, emphasizes the vulnerability of children and teens to Meta's design abuses, stating, "We simply can't trust Meta's assurances that they're focused on public safety when the facts speak so loudly for themselves: Meta will choose profits over kids' safety every time."
In response to the allegations about alerts, a Meta spokesperson defended the company's practices, asserting intentional design features to help teens take breaks and avoid notifications, including a "Quiet Mode" for muting notifications. The spokesperson highlighted efforts to notify teens to turn on Quiet Mode after a short time on Instagram at night and providing easy access to features allowing teens to mute notifications and accounts.
Regarding the lawsuits, a Meta spokesperson expressed disappointment, stating, "Instead of working productively with companies across the industry to create clear, age-appropriate standards for the many apps teens use, the attorneys general have chosen this path." The states are seeking financial damages and injunctive relief to block Meta from engaging in harmful or illegal practices outlined in the suit."
"In conclusion, the federal lawsuit against Meta underscores a multifaceted range of allegations, portraying the company as engaging in manipulative tactics that extend beyond the disruptive alerts discussed earlier. The lawsuit suggests that Meta's use of recommendation algorithms, emphasis on a potentially harmful 'likes' system, and deployment of visual filters contributing to negative body image among teens are integral elements of a broader strategy. The dispute intensifies with claims that Meta publicly downplayed risks, contradicted internal research, and collected personal data from underage users in violation of federal law.
As the legal battle unfolds, the accusations point to a clash between Meta's assurances of prioritizing public safety and the stark realities presented by critics. The company's alleged profit-centric approach, criticized by organizations like Fairplay, raises concerns about the well-being of young users in the face of pervasive online engagement strategies.
While Meta defends its practices, citing intentional design features and notification options for teen users, the legal landscape remains contentious. The states involved seek not only financial damages but also injunctive relief, aiming to curtail Meta's alleged harmful and illegal business practices. The outcome of this lawsuit may not only shape the future of Meta's operations but also contribute to broader conversations about the responsibility of social media platforms in safeguarding the mental health and well-being of their users, especially the vulnerable younger demographic."